How does Pinter play with our expectations of conversations to show power
in characters’ relationships?
In the play ‘The
Birthday Party’ by Harold Pinter, most of the conversations are slightly
awkward and stiff, making them seem unnatural. But this does mean that it is
easy to see which characters’ have power within relationship. For example, in
the relationship between Meg and Petey, Petey’s short responses to Meg’s petty
ramblings show that he has power in the relationship because he can quickly end
conversations and doesn’t feel as though he has to carry on the conversation.
Whereas Meg feels as though she has to carry on the conversation and tend to
Petey all the time, showing she is weaker and without power in the
relationship. Another example is the relationship between Goldberg and McCann.
In the relationship, Goldberg talks a lot and extends his sentences so that he
is talking for a longer time, symbolising that he has power over McCann as he
talks the most. But this could also symbolise that he has less power as he may
feel as though he has to talk for a long time every time he talk because if not
he wouldn’t get to talk at all. Lastly, another example of power in a
relationship is in the relationship between Stanley and Goldberg. In this
relationship Goldberg shows power by interrogating Stanley and making their conversations
awkward and uncomfortable.
No comments:
Post a Comment